1. What Iran offered, and why Washington said no
As of 9 October: the channel for talks exists, a deal is not in sight, and both sides are leaning on pressure. Parliament speaker Ghalibaf said on 4 October that the strait would stay closed until seven Iranian conditions were met; their wording has not been published (Arab News). President Pezeshkian called negotiations with Washington “futile” on 5 October: every time Iran comes to the negotiating table, he said, war is immediately imposed on it. Foreign Minister Araghchi had kept the door open on 4 October by saying that only talks built on justice and fairness could end the conflict (Al Jazeera, 7 October). On the US side Vice President JD Vance wants a “meaningful” reduction in Iran's enrichment capacity rather than mere assurances; experts see in it a possible sign that Washington is moving away from the earlier demand that Iran give up enrichment altogether. Secretary of State Rubio said Iran had lost control of the strait completely (Al Jazeera). On 8 October President Trump wrote that the US would not attack Iran “at any time prior to the Midterm Elections” on 3 November, that the talks were productive and that the blockade would remain “in full force and effect” (ABC News). Before that, reports that Washington had finalised plans for possible strikes ahead of the elections, without a final decision, had pushed oil higher (investingLive, 8 October).
The offer came in two steps. On 22 September a senior Iranian official told Reuters that Tehran could reopen the strait within seven days if the United States eased military pressure and lifted the blockade (Israel Hayom citing Reuters). On 25 September Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi presented the worked-out roadmap at the UN General Assembly: release of frozen Iranian funds, an end to oil sanctions and an end to the naval blockade, steps he said could be done in four to five days, with the strait reopened and final negotiations started on day seven (Al Jazeera). According to CBS News the package also covered a ceasefire across every front in the region, Lebanon included, with Qatar, Oman and UN officials in the middle.
President Trump rejected it on 26 September in front of reporters: "I'm rejecting their deal," adding that Iran wanted an agreement only "because they are losing so badly" (CBS News). The United States, he said, controls the strait (Times of Israel). The Wall Street Journal has reported that Trump told aides he expects to resume bombing after the November midterm elections (cited by Times of Israel). Araghchi's reply on 27 September: Iran will not back down on its conditions, only a negotiated settlement can end the stand-off, and Tehran is waiting for the mediators to relay Washington's final position (Al Jazeera, CBS News).
As of 2 October: the reply is in, the deal is not, and the threats are growing sharper. Araghchi met the Qatari mediators in New York on 28 September and expected the formal US reply by Tuesday (Al Jazeera). Trump told Axios the same day: "They want to make a deal, but it is not the deal that I want to make", and denied any concession: "I offered them NOTHING!"; a US official called the indirect talks "positive and constructive" but said there would be no deal unless the nuclear issues were addressed (CBS News). The reply arrived on 30 September via Qatar: according to Gulf News the two sides largely agree on the required steps but remain divided over their sequencing, in other words over who moves first. Iran's demands stand: an end to the naval blockade, sanctions waivers, release of about $12 billion in frozen assets and a regional ceasefire including Lebanon; Washington wants a comprehensive package that covers the nuclear programme (Al Jazeera). Araghchi: "We are fully prepared for the time for the war to be resumed" (Al Jazeera).
Since the US reply the tone has hardened on both sides. Iran threatened on 29 September: chief negotiator and parliament speaker Ghalibaf said that in a region where Iran cannot sell oil, nobody else will sell oil either, and that if Iran's security is not guaranteed, no infrastructure will remain safe; the Revolutionary Guards spokesman, Mohebbi, said: “Any vessel attempting to pass through sustains damage, either we strike it, or it hits a mine” (Times of Israel). The US side counters that it has the strait under control (Times of Israel, 26 September); the Revolutionary Guards explicitly called it “closed” on 29 September and disputed that account (Times of Israel). On 1 October Trump said: “We have to make that decision: We blow them up or make a deal” and “It's gonna end very soon, one way or the other”; whether bombing resumes after the election on 3 November he left open. The carrier group around USS Theodore Roosevelt left San Diego on 27 September and is due in the Arabian Sea between late October and late November, to join USS George H.W. Bush and USS George Washington (Gulf News). On 1 October a tanker in the Strait of Hormuz was also hit by an unknown projectile; it caught fire, the crew was unhurt and no one was named as responsible (UKMTO via Asharq Al-Awsat).
So the seven-day offer has failed, but the channel is open and the gap narrower than a week ago. The two sides read the situation in opposite ways: Washington sees Iran under pressure with no reason to be given concessions, Tehran sees the next move as Washington's. The record argues for caution either way. After the failed Islamabad talks the United States imposed its naval blockade in April, a memorandum did emerge in June, and on 8 July the ceasefire broke down again (Wikipedia, 2026 Strait of Hormuz campaign).
2. What actually flows through Hormuz today
As of 9 October: the attacks now reach deep into the Gulf, but no closure of the whole Gulf has been declared. On the evening of 7 October Britain's UKMTO reported a tanker hit by several projectiles about 51 nautical miles north of Madinat ash Shamal in Qatar, with casualties among the crew (warning 158-26, via Middle East Eye); the security firm Vanguard says the vessel is the Acers, flagged in Antigua and Barbuda (Seatrade Maritime). According to Euronews it was the first attack in these waters in more than six months. On 8 October Vanguard reported a fire on a tanker about 40 kilometres off Fujairah in the Gulf of Oman, cause unclear (Euronews). At 10:00 UTC on 9 October a projectile struck a supertanker about 13 nautical miles west of Al Jazeera in the UAE and the fire has been put out; shipping and security sources identify it as the Gem No.2, flagged in Panama (Reuters). The UKMTO names no perpetrator in any of the cases. The same day the IRGC Navy said it had hit the LPG tanker NV Sunshine on an unauthorised route south of the strait, and announced that its action against such vessels was no longer limited to the Strait of Hormuz: they would be pursued across the whole region, and companies that had allowed themselves to be deceived by the US would be sanctioned with all their ships (Tasnim, Press TV). Whether the NV Sunshine was hit has not been confirmed independently; Seatrade Maritime notes that Iranian bodies have reported attacks before that proved false.
There is no declaration that the whole Persian Gulf is closed. The Revolutionary Guards claim control of the strait and say that routes used without their permission are not allowed (Tasnim); IRGC chief Ahmad Vahidi said in a message released on 8 October for the IRGC Navy Day that security in the Persian Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz is a matter for the region and that no outside power has the right to interfere (Tasnim, 9 October). On 4 October the Joint Maritime Information Center rated the threat in the strait as “severe” and in the Arabian Gulf as “moderate”, with stable traffic there (JMIC, Update 102); that rating predates the attacks off Qatar and the UAE. Attacks inside the Gulf are not new in themselves: on 9 September a bunker tanker at anchor off the UAE and a supertanker off Iraq's Al-Faw were hit (Seatrade Maritime). US forces called Iran's claims of a closure false on 7 October and said merchant ships and energy shipments, including 20 million barrels of crude, were still passing, without giving a period (CENTCOM via IranWire); on 8 October Trump cited 22 million barrels in a single night, without a source (ABC News). Both sides are parties to the conflict. Independent figures lie in between: Kpler puts transits alone at 9.02 million barrels a day as a seven-day average to 3 October, about 47 per cent below the pre-war level by congress.net's own calculation; Kpler calls such fresh figures a provisional floor that is usually revised up substantially later (Kpler Insight via congress.net, 6 October), and crude exports from the region at roughly the pre-war level, because about 40 per cent of them bypass the strait (Kpler via Al Jazeera, 6 October). It is shipping that is getting dearer above all: the freight rate for a supertanker from the Gulf to China hit a record $1.3 million a day on 5 October, against an average of just under $60,000 a year earlier (Baltic Exchange via Bloomberg).
On the flow figures the strait is not shut, but it is a bottleneck, and for crude the flow has recovered: Kpler counted 13.5 million barrels a day of crude through Hormuz on 28 September, which IBTimes describes as the pre-war level; refined products, by contrast, managed only 677,000 barrels a day on a seven-day average, against 3.6 million before the war (Kpler via IBTimes UK, 1 October). The figures rest on different bases and must not be set against each other: 13.5 million is a daily reading for crude, while the September average was about 9.72 million barrels a day after a low of 2.2 million in July (Splash247 citing Kpler, 30 September). Goldman Sachs estimated at the end of September that about 23 million barrels a day leave the Middle East via Hormuz and alternative routes, close to pre-war levels (Bloomberg via Rigzone, 30 September); on 20 September CENTCOM put the strait at about 10 million, with Iran itself exporting zero barrels and the main lanes cleared of mines (Admiral Brad Cooper, Business Standard citing Bloomberg). Passage is not safe: on 29 September the British UKMTO reported two ships hit by projectiles, and on 1 October a tanker was struck by an unknown projectile, caught fire, the crew was unhurt and no one was named as responsible (UKMTO via Gulf News and Asharq Al-Awsat). Who controls the strait is disputed: the US side says it has it under control, while the Revolutionary Guards called it “closed” on 29 September and disputed that account (Times of Israel). The picture is not uniform: on 30 September Gulf News still described crude, products and gas as well below normal, with shipowners demanding high risk premiums. Before the war the strait handled about 125 large merchant ships a day (Israel Hayom) and roughly a fifth of global oil and LNG trade (EnergyNow). The gap is what the world market has been covering since March with stock draws, pipelines and higher US exports.
The bypass routes are themselves under fire. Saudi Arabia's East-West pipeline, which together with the UAE bypass carried around 5 million barrels a day around Hormuz in the second quarter (Fortune/McKinsey, 17 September), was knocked out by drones in mid-September and has been running at about half capacity again since the end of September; tankers are being loaded at Yanbu once more (Reuters via The Nation, 29 September). According to Kpler, Saudi Arabia exported about 5.4 million barrels of crude a day in September after 2.45 million in August, with about 2.65 million going through Yanbu, heading towards 3 to 4 million; the Gulf states together reached 16.33 million barrels a day, the highest since the war began at the end of February, against 19.51 million in February (Splash247 citing Kpler, 30 September). Brent fell 2.6 per cent to $102.59 on 29 September. On 24 September Saudi air defences intercepted six Houthi ballistic missiles aimed at Taif province and the Yanbu area, the pipeline's Red Sea terminal, and Brent rose 3.4 per cent that day (Reuters via Investing.com). On 26 September drones targeted Riyadh and a missile flew towards Khamis Mushait; all were intercepted (Times of Israel). The EIA's outlook of 9 September assumes constraints lasting into the second quarter of 2027 (EIA STEO). Our glossary entry on the Strait of Hormuz explains why the waterway matters this much.
3. Three scenarios after the rejection
As of 9 October: scenario 1, the stalemate, still holds, but at sea it is turning more violent. Politically, Trump has ruled out new attacks before 3 November (ABC News); the part of scenario 3 that involves air strikes therefore falls after the election at the earliest. At sea, though, the escalation is already here: the attacks reach as far as Qatar and the UAE, and the Revolutionary Guards announce that they will pursue ships on unauthorised routes across the whole region (Tasnim). The market has priced in both: Brent rose 4.1 per cent to $104.28 on 8 October, partly because of Hurricane Isaias, which shut in 62.9 per cent of oil output in the US Gulf of Mexico according to the US Marine Minerals Administration; it came off its intraday high on Thursday after Trump had published his pledge (Bloomberg via Rigzone, gCaptain). On Friday morning Brent stood at $102.81 (HeizOel24.ch). For scenario 2, a deal, there is still no agreed order of steps, and both sides are arguing over it (Al Jazeera, 7 October).
Scenario 1, stalemate: the rejection stands, the mediators keep working, and the strait stays a bottleneck that the US side calls controlled and the Revolutionary Guards called “closed” on 29 September (Times of Israel). That is where things stand on 2 October, now with a US reply on the table. The week after the rejection showed what this scenario looks like: Brent jumped more than four dollars in early trade on 28 September and settled only about one per cent higher at $105.28 as Qatar announced separate talks (investingLive); on the 29th it fell 2.6 per cent to $102.59 as Saudi Arabia resumed exports via Yanbu (Reuters via The Nation); on the 30th the expiring November contract settled at $103.53 and the December contract at $98.03 (Bloomberg via Rigzone); on 1 October the December contract jumped 4.37 per cent to $102.31 after Chinese refiners suspended product exports other than to Hong Kong and Macau until further notice, according to four people familiar with the matter and without official confirmation from China (Reuters via Dawn); at 13:14 on 2 October it stood at $100.03 (HeizOel24.ch), and in the afternoon it briefly fell below $99 (Trading Economics), after the G7 decided to release 100 million barrels through the IEA, starting immediately and spread over four months, with a “substantial” share of diesel in the first 20 days (The Irish Times, 16:25). Supply pushes down, diplomacy holds the premium, and news such as the Chinese export halt or the G7 decision on reserves moves the price by several dollars within a day; Brent stays well above the summer but far below the monthly high near $110. For heating oil this means a high price with no clear direction: German heating oil at €164.57 per 100 litres at 12:24 on 2 October (HeizOel24), French ordinaire at €1,849 per 1,000 litres on 1 October (prixfioul.fr).
Scenario 2, a deal after all: crude reacts first and hardest. When reports of an agreement circulated on 12 June, Brent fell 3.37 per cent in one session to $87.33 (Yahoo Finance); Goldman Sachs put the value of a normalisation one month earlier at roughly $10 a barrel for late 2026 (Yahoo Finance, 21 June). Diesel and heating oil would follow more slowly, because US distillate stocks are at their lowest September level since 1982 (EnergyNow) and Russia's diesel export ban runs to the end of October (Hydrocarbon Processing). Gas would move with oil, because a reopening would bring Qatari LNG back.
Scenario 3, escalation: attacks on ships, pipelines or ports, or a return to air strikes. The market knows the pattern from the summer: after the ceasefire broke on 8 July, Brent climbed from $71.57 on 1 July to $96.78 on 24 July, and the year's high was $118.35 on 31 March (Wikipedia). This time diesel rather than crude would lead, because stocks are empty and on 26 September Ukrainian drones halted the Ilsky refinery in Russia's Krasnodar region, which produces nearly 6.6 million tonnes of fuel a year (Kyiv Independent). The political risk is now spelled out: Trump left open on 1 October whether to resume attacks after the election on 3 November, and a third aircraft carrier, USS Theodore Roosevelt, is due in the Arabian Sea between late October and late November (Gulf News); Iran threatened on 29 September to attack infrastructure and ships (Times of Israel), and on 1 October a tanker was hit (UKMTO via Asharq Al-Awsat). Which scenario plays out will be settled between Washington, Tehran and the mediators, not on the exchange; our Oil price today page keeps the daily reading.
4. What to do now, and what not to do
Do not trade on headlines, but take note that the picture has turned: the one piece of news that could make heating oil cheaper in the short run, a Hormuz deal, has not been off the table since Trump's no of 26 September, but it has no date: the US reply of 30 September settles the steps, not their order (Gulf News). If your tank is below a third, order; heating oil follows crude with a lag of days, and dealers pass on falls more slowly than rises (see pass-through effect). Above two thirds you can wait, but you are no longer waiting for a deadline, only for talks without a date. For orientation: heating oil cost on average €164.57 per 100 litres in Germany at 12:24 on 2 October for a 3,000-litre order (HeizOel24) and €1,849 per 1,000 litres ordinaire in France on 1 October (prixfioul.fr). The full rule with every threshold is on Heating oil: buy now or wait?, and the Northeast outlook on Northeast heating oil forecast.
For diesel users relief comes more slowly whatever happens, for the reasons set out on our page about the diesel shortage of winter 2026/27. For gas customers in Europe the question is whether things calm down before winter: German storage stood at 57.7 per cent in the latest reading (Federal Network Agency, via ZDFheute of 30 September), and minister Reiche has ordered Sefe to buy and store eight terawatt hours of gas by 15 December because of continuing geopolitical risks (ZDFheute); details on gas storage and winter 2026/27. The broader status of the crisis is on our Hormuz crisis hub.
See in a minute what Brent at 90, 100 or 120 dollars means for your household.
Calculate my numbers